Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:03:08 +0100 From: Raphael Eiselstein <rabe@uugrn.org> To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Raphael Eiselstein <rabe@uugrn.org> Subject: Re: Using just db44 for all instead of mixed usage of db41/db42/db44 (was: Re: mutt vs db44 // Bug in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk ?) Message-ID: <20130218220307.GA4315@ma.sigsys.de> In-Reply-To: <CACdU%2Bf8HmvjzugmHXK15O4JJdJEkjgfoMmDyL7riobbne_r=OA@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130208201503.GB4018@ma.sigsys.de> <20130208220108.GC4018@ma.sigsys.de> <86ehgpabwi.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> <20130209131330.GF4018@ma.sigsys.de> <20130215230004.GB4056@ma.sigsys.de> <CACdU%2Bf8HmvjzugmHXK15O4JJdJEkjgfoMmDyL7riobbne_r=OA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 06:14:28PM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > The reason that there are so many BDB versions in ports is that > several of the functions had additional arguments added or swapped > between versions. What will happen if one binary is linked against db41 *and* db44 through other libraries? ldd showed db41 and db44 for the mutt binary, what will happen when calling one of these "unstable" functions?=20 What is the difference between linking against db41 *plus* db44 or linking just to db44 for all binaries? Conflicts? Overloading? Segfaults? How may I (automatically) check for incompatible db4x-Version? compiler/linker errors? Runtime errors? Data structure errors in data files? Data loss or corrupted db files? Regards Raphael --=20 Raphael Eiselstein <rabe@uugrn.org> http://rabe.uugrn.org/ xmpp:freibyter@gmx.de | https://www.xing.com/profile/Raphael_Eiselstein = =20 GnuPG: E7B2 1D66 3AF2 EDC7 9828 6D7A 9CDA 3E7B 10CA 9F2D =2E........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.. --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlEipRsACgkQnNo+exDKny1UPgCfWlne7+uh40UQhcE/rJNLx0wo MCMAnAyDtukFgU4L+Kn3HAEOUWzM4fy3 =1v1p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130218220307.GA4315>