Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 11:54:39 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Mark Newton <newton@atdot.dotat.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: *1 routines in /sys/kern Message-ID: <199901301654.LAA07382@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199901300730.SAA20522@atdot.dotat.org> References: <199901300730.SAA20522@atdot.dotat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:00:15 +1030 (CST), Mark Newton <newton@atdot.dotat.org> said: > If I split sigaction(), sigsuspend(), sigpending(), sigprocmask() and > sigaltstack() into front-end and back-end pieces a-la NetBSD so that > emulator-specific signal semantics can be imposed without totally > duplicating those routines inside the emulator (like I did with > sendit() and recvit() for socket I/O), will anyone complain? I'd say, ``go ahead''. But you should probably include a comment in the source file indicating the reason for the split, so that someone else maintaining the code can figure it out. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901301654.LAA07382>