Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 17:40:52 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, FreeBSD-CURRENT Mailing List <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Message-ID: <31924.957282052@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 May 2000 17:14:31 %2B0200." <v04220802b53497c902d8@[195.238.1.121]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 02 May 2000 17:14:31 +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: > > Sleepycats license is not FreeBSD compatible :-/ > > I don't understand. Reading > <http://www.sleepycat.com/license.net>, it seems to me that FreeBSD > meets all the necessary requirements. Can someone who understands the > details of the licensing issues either explain the situation to me, or > provide pointers to references that do? This is taken from http://www.sleepycat.com/licensing.html: If you redistribute your application outside of your site and your source code is not freely available and redistributable by others, then you require a commercial license from Sleepycat Software. This means that the software's presence in FreeBSD makes FreeBSD unsuitable for building and selling a black box solution. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31924.957282052>