Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:41:45 -0700
From:      "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>
To:        christian russell <christian.baltini@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Current state of Intel XL710 40G NIC ixl performance
Message-ID:  <CAHM0Q_PTegwXmvBpSYhXSGdvdTW9sY=QHS0giAqsZee=WiB6bQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAESVrtyFJ2W-jmmpq4a-uaCaXN8K3XLuFenW7%2Bu8=LgL2xn8rg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAESVrtyFJ2W-jmmpq4a-uaCaXN8K3XLuFenW7%2Bu8=LgL2xn8rg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On a single-client basis the fastest rates we see are around 5 Gbps.
> Hitting this server from multiple boxes we see peaks of 20 Gbps at the very
> highest.  More frequently things top off around 13 Gbps.  These numbers are
> coming from iperf tests.  We are seeing similar numbers with direct
> point-to-point as well as switched topologies.
>
> These threads from 2015 describe similar issues but fizzled out:
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2015-May/042273.html
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2015-October/043584.html
>
> Is there very particular tuning required to get these cards working at
> proper speed?  Any insights?

This is unfortunate. The iflib version of the ixl driver performed
quite well under NFLX load several years ago. I even saw 39Gbps single
stream with v6. Fortunately, Intel will eventually be pushing the
iflib version to HEAD.

-M



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHM0Q_PTegwXmvBpSYhXSGdvdTW9sY=QHS0giAqsZee=WiB6bQ>