Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 14:51:26 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts.c Message-ID: <199912182151.OAA91959@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:50:24 EST." <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912181246340.76308-100000@green.dyndns.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912181246340.76308-100000@green.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912181246340.76308-100000@green.dyndns.org> Brian Fundakowski Feldman writes: : I concluded otherwise. Which has more weight: the evidence toward : immunity, or the evidence toward vulnerability? I can assure you : that this problem was still there under 3.X a few months ago, with : RELENG_3 and HEAD fts.c, but only fixed in OpenBSD's fts.c. And : nothing's changed since then before now; both HEAD and RELENG_3 : both had big problems with fts(3). Ah, I thought I had committed Bruce's fixes, but it turns out that they are just in my tree.... : > One reason I didn't do something similar was that there were binary : > compat issues that I didn't want to introduce... : : Huh? The API didn't change, at all. There was at least one API change in OpenBSD tree that resulted in their bumping libc's version. This change was specifically omitted in previous merges. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912182151.OAA91959>