Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:29:58 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrew Pantyukhin <sat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, osa@freebsd.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/ftp/gwget Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/ftp/gwget/files patch-src__gwget_data.c patch-src_gwget_data.c patch-src_main.c patch-src_wget-log.c Message-ID: <20060511052958.GA69280@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <200605101908.k4AJ89iI073410@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200605101908.k4AJ89iI073410@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:08:09PM +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> sat 2006-05-10 19:08:09 UTC
[...]
> 1.1 +10 -0 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src__gwget_data.c (new)
> 1.2 +0 -10 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src_gwget_data.c (dead)
About the patches filenaming under files/ we are trying to follow some
convention - see ports/Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl, it's best to always
use that for generating the file names for new patches.
The reason for not renaming all ports/*/*/files/* to conform to a single
convention is that the history would be lost.
You should avoid renaming files this way (whatever the new and the
old names are) because the history is lost.
--
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv
Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFEYsvWFw6SP/bBpCARAqw0AJ9se6u6munGWo8xg3Izqt/cNzAUtQCgw9xk
2/xgLVht1yxyL3smDbSFQT4=
=97E6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060511052958.GA69280>