Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:43:07 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 mp_machdep.csrc/sys/amd64/include cpufunc.h src/sys/i386/i386 mp_machdep.c src/sys/i386/include cpufunc.h Message-ID: <20050516114307.GE34537@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20050516053818.E53620@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <97079.1116154766@critter.freebsd.dk> <4287AD84.6070600@root.org> <20050516080031.GD34537@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20050516053818.E53620@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:41:23AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: >The statement about schedulers is not entirely true. ULE has lots of >special case code for HTT, and 4bsd even has a small amount. My apologies. I was under the impression that 4bsd saw N CPUs and treated them all as equal. I knew one of the design goals of ULE was to make it possible to handle CPUs with different capabilities but I didn't realise you'd done more than install the hooks. Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050516114307.GE34537>