Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:53:13 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: David Schultz <das@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r230363 - in head/lib/libc/softfloat: . bits32 bits64 Message-ID: <201201200753.13232.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120120065006.GA80490@zim.MIT.EDU> References: <201201200616.q0K6GEwT026852@svn.freebsd.org> <20120120065006.GA80490@zim.MIT.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, January 20, 2012 1:50:06 am David Schultz wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012, David Schultz wrote: > > Merge in the latest SoftFloat changes from NetBSD. (NetBSD isn't the > > original vendor, but we're using their heavily modified version.) > > This brings in functions for long double emulation (both extended and > > quad formats), which may be useful for testing, and also for replacing > > libc/sparc64/fpu/. > > I'd appreciate it if an svn guru could let me know if anything > needs to be done to record the fact that this is a merged copy of > /vendor/NetBSD/softfloat/dist@230364. `svn merge --record-only $url' > didn't do anything, I'm guessing because there's no history yet. > The previous libc/softfloat sources were a mishmash, so I didn't try > to recreate any merge history for those. Did you use 'svn cp' to add the bits in from the vendor tree? If so, there's no need to do an record-only merge. In general we only need to do record-only merge to bootstrap mergeinfo when doing the first merge for a vendor tree after the CVS -> SVN conversion. For new vendor sources that are 'svn cp'd from the vendor area, SVN will just DTRT from the start. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201201200753.13232.jhb>