Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 14:37:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@nas.nasa.gov> To: Zhihui Zhang <zzhang@cs.binghamton.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of UMAPFS Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.991020143410.26697C-100000@marcy.nas.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.991016132650.11155A-100000@sol.cs.binghamton.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote: > On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote: > > > > > Is the UMAPFS working? I add "options UMAPFS" to the configuration file > > of FreeBSD 3.3-Release and rebuilt the kernel. I got the following > > errors: > > > > loading kernel > > umap_vnops.o: In function `umap_lock': > > umap_vnops.o(.text+0x568): undefined reference to `null_bypass' > > umap_vnops.o: In function `umap_unlock': > > umap_vnops.o(.text+0x58e): undefined reference to `null_bypass' > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > > I find out that you must also include NULLFS in the kernel to compile. I > have tested NULLFS and UMAPFS with some trivial commands. Both works. In NetBSD, we changed these two references to be to umap_bypass since it is, after all, umapfs. :-) Take care, Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.96.991020143410.26697C-100000>