Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:47:04 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com>, net@freebsd.org Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: netmap in GENERIC, by default, on HEAD Message-ID: <545A6298.9070809@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <545A47A5.4010601@yandex.ru> References: <92D22BEA-DDE5-4C6E-855C-B8CACB0319AC@neville-neil.com> <545A47A5.4010601@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 05.11.2014 18:52, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > recently we did some IP forwarding tests and the GENERIC kernel is > several times faster than GENERIC+IPSEC. Even when IPSEC has no SA. > > I didn't do test on vanilla kernel, but our kernel is able forward > IPv4/IPv6 on rate close to 8.6 Mpps. The same kernel compiled with IPSEC > can forward only 180 kpps. Sorry, I showed wrong numbers here. IPSEC kernel in this test gives 2.4 Mpps, but with encryption only 180 kpps. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUWmKcAAoJEAHF6gQQyKF6U+8IAJQZBnPAeA1oxWc1AWBGbiPX lxixHdwfk9OSzJCNUXGRegDElDEDqMhCEaIKK020CDUiz8OBspkCDTZ+A10Rjt9f NC6w11MLLSM6k1GM265WyaBlXdh9YKMqosRocL3+6fHfezrJGKMjDMQed++klWye QLp14ooj/mPmK5bA4SpRedvRGkVeuB6eKF4Ep+N0OJzEsrUiRlPOEvkEPo8aJhg8 lD4eIb54bazAg94vm7i+jCa3BovU4V8/jBxg4il7bVoodm/YoEUwgOjlqDTSv6u9 wHLegYXojdkx14aNuGbt1VC5rh1Ln6vm6WN94N8Z5Ri+NUeFEPIgBRoGrlloo7Q= =1LXs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?545A6298.9070809>