Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:38:02 +0100 From: phk@phk.freebsd.dk To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf NOTES src/sys/alpha/conf NOTES src/sys/i386/conf NOTES Message-ID: <69354.1046021882@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 23 Feb 2003 12:19:33 EST." <20030223121933.D49626@espresso.bsdmike.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030223121933.D49626@espresso.bsdmike.org>, Mike Barcroft writes: >Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> nyan 2003/02/23 05:32:33 PST >> >> Modified files: >> sys/conf NOTES >> sys/alpha/conf NOTES >> sys/i386/conf NOTES >> Log: >> Move MD devices to <machine>/conf/NOTES. >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.148 +187 -0 src/sys/alpha/conf/NOTES >> 1.1130 +0 -183 src/sys/conf/NOTES >> 1.1075 +183 -1 src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES > >This doesn't look right to me. If options are shared with at least 2 >architectures they are MI. We may need quirks so that they don't get >compiled on PC98, but I think this should be addressed with >conditionals of some sort. What happens when we add sparc64 NOTES? >Do we copy these 183 lines again? Maybe we need a metafile: all option FOO pc98,i386,alpha option BAR -alpha device GNAF -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?69354.1046021882>