Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 18:51:35 +1100 From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Pavel Cahyna <pavel.cahyna@st.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Subject: re: glibc vs BSD libc Message-ID: <26445.1043394695@splode.eterna.com.au> In-Reply-To: your message of "Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:52:03 -0800." <20030123195203.GG60077@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
They presumably did it because they thought it would be a good idea.
Perhaps they wanted to hide implementation differences between
different OSes. Either way, the low-level functions in FreeBSD work
just fine.
FWIW, i just ran "man funopen" on my netbsd box and it says:
HISTORY
The funopen() functions first appeared in 4.4BSD.
BUGS
The funopen() function may not be portable to systems other than BSD.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26445.1043394695>