Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:56:01 +1100 (EST) From: Peter Hoskin <peterh@criten.org> To: James Pole <james.pole@paradise.net.nz> Cc: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>, "" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Problem with NVIDIA kernel driver with recent kernel Message-ID: <20030128125328.L1701-100000@extortion.peterh.dropbear.id.au> In-Reply-To: <1043716452.96617.3.camel@localhost> References: <20030127204647.GA373@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <00b501c2c647$eeb5ba60$0e0c32d4@niked> <20030127230130.GA3246@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <1043714433.96161.14.camel@localhost> <1043715322.85849.6.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> <1043716452.96617.3.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, James Pole wrote: > How can you tell the difference in 2D performance between 'nv' and > NVIDIA's 'nvidia' driver? The difference is very very small -- unless > you can back up your claims with 2D benchmarks which proves that > NVIDIA's driver is indeed better at 2D... Who needs a benchmark? Play an mpeg file. If its an older CPU (below 600mhz) you usually end up missing quite a few frames if you use the nv driver. Also, it doesn't look quite right. Although, with the NVIDIA driver things seem to be better. Regards, Peter Hoskin peterh@criten.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030128125328.L1701-100000>