Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:23:57 +0100 From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> To: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r234352 - in head/sys: amd64/linux32 compat/linux i386/linux kern Message-ID: <20121112002357.GA28689@dft-labs.eu> In-Reply-To: <20120628213626.GA23256@server.rulingia.com> References: <201204162122.q3GLM23E051048@svn.freebsd.org> <20120628213626.GA23256@server.rulingia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 07:36:26AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Apr-16 21:22:02 +0000, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >Log: > > - Implement pipe2 syscall for Linuxulator. This syscall appeared in 2.6.27 > > but GNU libc used it without checking its kernel version, e. g., Fedora 10. > > Recent versions of flash are complaining about the lack of pipe2(). > Do you have any plans to MFC this? I've had a quick look but there > are non-trivial conflicts in kern/sys_pipe.c on both 8.x & 9.x and > I don't want to spend time resolving them if you have already done so. > Conflicts at least for 9.x were not that scary after all. My only intervention is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/stable9-pipe2-sys_pipe.diff I'm happy to merge this to stable/9 once someone reviews this. Full path with regenerated syscall.master for easier testing: http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/stable9-pipe2-full.diff -- Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121112002357.GA28689>