Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 06:50:44 -0700 From: Chip Wiegand <chip@wiegand.org> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Just an observation - MUA's seen in the lists Message-ID: <20010413065044.3824814c.chip@wiegand.org> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010413000646.00cca610@localhost> References: <20010412222604.5bb984ab.chip@wiegand.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20010413000646.00cca610@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So you believe windoze to be more reliable than BSD? You would rather put your mission-critical data on a windoze box (which is generally accepted by the industry as less reliable than a *nix box)? Maybe eudora is a better, in some ways, mua than most of the *nix mua's, but that isn't the OS. I use FreeBSD everyday on my workstation and on several other machines at home, and they have never crashed or had any of the problems the windoze machines seem to be prone to. You make an intersting statement. -- Chip On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 00:07:58 -0600 Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> surely must have wrote something like: > At 11:26 PM 4/12/2001, Chip Wiegand wrote: > > >I recently noticed, while reading through these lists, that a large > >number of messages posted are coming from windoze computers. This is > >just a observation, based on the header that shows the mua the message > >was sent from. > > It's OK to use an unreliable machine for your MUA, just so long as > your mission-critical data is backed up on a machine running a > RELIABLE operating system! > > --Brett Glass, who's writing this on Eudora on a Windows box To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010413065044.3824814c.chip>