Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 20:42:41 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>, Erich Boleyn <erich@uruk.org>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentium CPU steppings Message-ID: <3226.849296561@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 29 Nov 1996 12:35:24 MST." <199611291935.MAA29466@clem.systemsix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>--- >note that both 1 & 2 have a feature value of 1bf, neither >of which have the APIC bit set (bit #9). 2.1.0 claims the >90mHz chip has an APIC, which I didn't expect, while 2.1.5 >claims it doesn't have an APIC, which is consistant with 1bf. 2.1.0 was bogus. Somebody tried to use %b without using too much time on the task. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3226.849296561>