Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:09:00 -0500 (EST)
From:      Robert Watson <robert@cyrus.watson.org>
To:        proff@suburbia.net
Cc:        Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au>, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: tcpdump
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.990203100014.27795F-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <19990203085051.1688.qmail@suburbia.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999 proff@suburbia.net wrote:

> Frankly I'm sick of seeing anal security idiots undermining useful
> functionality. I don't see why we should let this useless, winging
> segment of the network community, which spends all its time working
> out new ways to prevent people doing anything, shove their uncreative
> bankrupt, and wholly paranoid philosophy down everyone else's throats.

Come now, I resent that :).  I consider myself an anal security.. er..
person :).

My feeling is that it is actually very important that system designers
impose security features on an operating system: they are in the best
position to do so while maintaining maximum flexibility and functionality. 
They have the best understanding of the system and what its limitations
are.  Patching security on afterwards is almost always a disaster. 

However, you'll note that some of the argument here has been about whether
limiting access to bpfilter actually improves security, or whether it just
makes access to the packets more obscure.  And it is quickly clear that
with capabilities such as lkm/kld that it is merely obscurity in low
securelevels.  Similarly open/close limitations are not sufficient in
securelevels because of other operating system features that require
modification to understand these limits.  A trully paranoid security
philosophy requires seeing the whole picture, not just the parts; 
incorrect slapping on of limiting security patches that have no real
effect on the actual security of the system are of no use.  As such I
welcome a truly paranoid security idiot who wants to be involved in
FreeBSD :-). 

  Robert N Watson 

robert@fledge.watson.org              http://www.watson.org/~robert/
PGP key fingerprint: 03 01 DD 8E 15 67 48 73  25 6D 10 FC EC 68 C1 1C

Carnegie Mellon University            http://www.cmu.edu/
TIS Labs at Network Associates, Inc.  http://www.tis.com/
SafePort Network Services             http://www.safeport.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990203100014.27795F-100000>