Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:32:18 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: Mathew Kanner <mat@cnd.mcgill.ca> Subject: Re: de-dma uaudio Message-ID: <425FFAA2.6010605@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20050415104454.gyvwnsp8g40kg0g4@netchild.homeip.net> References: <20050410195645.GA2178@cnd.mcgill.ca> <20050414.021552.343134310.kazuhito@ph.noda.tus.ac.jp> <20050413172534.GF2178@cnd.mcgill.ca> <20050414161546.kwroviadwsw8k0w0@netchild.homeip.net> <425ED3F0.70603@elischer.org> <20050415095335.46kkjh7q4gkwook0@netchild.homeip.net> <425F77EB.7080902@elischer.org> <20050415104454.gyvwnsp8g40kg0g4@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: > >> no-one is saying that it can't be optimised.. >> try follow a read command from a ugen fd all the way to the hardware.. >> >> it's just not something we've spent time to do. > > > So this means it isn't counter productive when we remove the DMA code > from > uaudio, since it has to be allocated at another place if we want to > move to > a zero-copy design? basically, yes. > > Bye, > Alexander. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?425FFAA2.6010605>