Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 03:44:44 +0300 From: =?koi8-r?B?5M3J1NLJyiDzydfB3sXOy88=?= <mitya@demos.su> To: Ying-Chieh Liao <ijliao@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, demon@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: how about merge x11-wm/afterstep and x11-wm/afterstep-stable ? Message-ID: <20020302004444.GA17567@cavia.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020301062029.GA79330@terry.dragon2.net> References: <20020301062029.GA79330@terry.dragon2.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:20:29PM +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: > I dont know why we have both afterstep & afterstep-stable > can we merge them into one port or repo-copy afterstep-stable to afterstep ? > > btw, the latest afterstep is 1.8.10 (on official site) > -- > Allocate four digits for the year part of a date : a new millennium is coming. > --- David Huber I already proposed this some time ago. Several people (e.g. steve, if my memory doesn't fail me) insisted to keep afterstep port at version 1... I am all for it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020302004444.GA17567>