Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:24:55 -0400 From: LuMiWa <lumiwa@dismail.de> To: Peter Boosten via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: Peter Boosten <freebsd@boosten.org> Subject: Re: pkg lock Message-ID: <20210812172455.2f3f614f@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <C131AFDB-19D7-400D-B17E-EFBAF389D293@boosten.org> References: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> <C131AFDB-19D7-400D-B17E-EFBAF389D293@boosten.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:44:16 +0200 Peter Boosten via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > On 12 Aug 2021, at 18:54, LuMiWa via freebsd-questions > > <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > I am using binary packages (latest) on FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE. > > I have 8 applications where I have my own settings. Is it correct > > when I built the and install that I should use "pkg lock name" of > > port/package, please? Or is something other. > > > > > > Yes, that’s the way to go, assuming you build from ports. I have > several ports that require different setting (postfix and dovecot > eith mysql dependency) and a pkg ipgrade would overwrite them with > default packages. > > Peter Thank you. Looks like I am doing correct :). -- "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.” Leo Tolstoy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210812172455.2f3f614f>