Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:36:28 -0500
From:      "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Andrew Pantyukhin <sat@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm Makefile ports/x11-wm/wmii Makefile ports/x11-wm/wmii-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/x11-
Message-ID:  <45F11C8C.27383.3FEAEA@dan.langille.org>
In-Reply-To: <45F081D8.5040202@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200703082025.l28KPtnW061532@repoman.freebsd.org>, <45F0343D.26013.156E5B04@dan.langille.org>, <45F081D8.5040202@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 Mar 2007 at 13:36, Doug Barton wrote:

> Dan Langille wrote:
> 
> > A forced commit on ports/x11-wm/wmii-devel/pkg-descr would give 
> > FreshPorts something to display here:
> 
> And improving your software would eliminate the need for otherwise 
> pointless commits.

Yes, yes it would.

My original post arose after being told that a forced commit after a 
repo-copy was standard procedure.  Nothing else.

However, the problem of determining whether or not a repo-copy has 
occurred is rather difficult to solve in a 100% satisfactory 
solution.

I've thought about it a lot, but I'm happy to have further 
suggestions, offline.

-- 
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.pgcon.org/





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45F11C8C.27383.3FEAEA>