Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:31:50 +0200 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Tim Kellers <timothyk@wallnet.com>, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Subject: Re: FSJ clone Message-ID: <200809212331.51267.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <48D6B72C.4060000@wallnet.com> References: <f84c38580809211225o5e612affx8bd5d80da1afc8d8@mail.gmail.com> <20080921221347.I15388@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <48D6B72C.4060000@wallnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 21 September 2008 23:05:48 Tim Kellers wrote:
> multimedia files. It works very well when the target (or source) file
> is a large multimedia file that needs to be transmitted in small
> sections and reassembled.
Then it's no different then split/cat. It would be different, if it would
handle different multimedia formats special, preserving keyframes accross
parts, for example. FreeBSD split/cat is perfectly capable of handling large
files and doesn't need tons of #ifdef's to be Portable(tm).
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809212331.51267.fbsd.questions>