Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 11:52:23 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Matt Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r334104 - in head/sys: netinet sys Message-ID: <2281830.zrSQodBeDb@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <201805231700.w4NH05hs047395@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201805231700.w4NH05hs047395@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 05:00:05 PM Matt Macy wrote: > Author: mmacy > Date: Wed May 23 17:00:05 2018 > New Revision: 334104 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/334104 > > Log: > epoch: allow for conditionally asserting that the epoch context fields > are unused by zeroing on INVARIANTS builds Is M_ZERO really so bad that you need to make it conditional? I would probably have preferred something like 'M_ZERO_INVARIANTS' instead perhaps (or M_ZERO_EPOCH) that only controls M_ZERO and is still or'd with M_WAITOK or M_NOWAIT. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2281830.zrSQodBeDb>