Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:02:35 -0600 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE Interactivity perf patch Message-ID: <3FE32F2B.4010808@centtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20031219092634.C36463-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <20031219092634.C36463-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeff Roberson wrote: >I realized a pitfal in the way that I'm doing slice assignment for >interactive tasks. I'd like to have as many people test this as possible, >in case there are unintended consequences. What this patch does is allow >interactive tasks to have longer time-slices so that they may be more >efficient. > >This patch is intended to fix the poor performance of some interactive >processes while under high load, especially high load with other >interactive tasks present. > > "it works" - rebuilt, rebooted, and run some basic tests - looks fine.. Although I haven't noticed anything major in the change yet.. but all seems well.. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology All generalizations are false, including this one. ------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FE32F2B.4010808>