Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 11:26:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> To: Harald Eilertsen <haraldei@anduin.net> Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openjdk build failures on "nm" Message-ID: <246244335.3613.1757582776002@localhost> In-Reply-To: <mxss65u22c5oy4gvokvpc472yospz5mtyv7aionej5qgq7ycx2@jpxajffsomeh> References: <1221594030.658.1756976173189@localhost> <wy6tjmjqq3temf3smm7vbohvxd5hvvaplrycx66zmfffkwg4sn@2lfjlx3fp7xr> <1330428831.1750.1756980558066@localhost> <efoy4e5mqaa5xen277swrpj3w2mgthmkxza5p3k3hbxfpc7hn5@joytibqygluz> <2053927433.1876.1757575928041@localhost> <mxss65u22c5oy4gvokvpc472yospz5mtyv7aionej5qgq7ycx2@jpxajffsomeh>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] I committed the change. Looking through https://portsfallout.com/fallout?port=java/openjdk again, I noticed that it does not fail on main, only on 13.5 and 14.2. I don't know if that is a coincidence, a difference in the pkg cluster on main or some difference in clang/llvm or other build tooling. But I thought it is worth mentioning. Regards, Ronald. Van: Harald Eilertsen <haraldei@anduin.net> Datum: donderdag, 11 september 2025 10:15 Aan: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> CC: java@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: openjdk build failures on "nm" > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 09:32:08AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > > As it seems hard to debug, what do the java@ maintainers think of this experiment? > > > > diff --git a/java/openjdk17/Makefile b/java/openjdk17/Makefile > > index 5cb25e6aee72..ba7001ff2bd0 100644 > > --- a/java/openjdk17/Makefile > > +++ b/java/openjdk17/Makefile > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ GH_PROJECT= jdk17u > > > > NO_CCACHE= yes > > > > -_MAKE_JOBS= # > > +MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes > > MAKE_ENV= LANG="C" \ > > LC_ALL="C" \ > > CLASSPATH="" \ > > That's well spotted! I think this is definitely worth trying. I'm no > expert on the ports Makefiles myself, but was told to use > MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE instead in the review for openjdk24. Haven't gone > through all the ancient version yet, as my focus is mainly on mainline, > and these days on openjdk25. > > > I can commit this today to openjdk17 and if builds start to succeed to other openjdk* ports. > > I'm in favour! > > H! > > > [-- Attachment #2 --] <html><head></head><body>I committed the change.<br> <br> Looking through <a href="https://portsfallout.com/fallout?port=java/openjdk">https://portsfallout.com/fallout?port=java/openjdk</a> again, I noticed that it does not fail on main, only on 13.5 and 14.2. I don't know if that is a coincidence, a difference in the pkg cluster on main or some difference in clang/llvm or other build tooling.<br> <br> But I thought it is worth mentioning.<br> <br> Regards,<br> Ronald.<br> <br> <p><strong>Van:</strong> Harald Eilertsen <haraldei@anduin.net><br> <strong>Datum:</strong> donderdag, 11 september 2025 10:15<br> <strong>Aan:</strong> Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws><br> <strong>CC:</strong> java@freebsd.org<br> <strong>Onderwerp:</strong> Re: openjdk build failures on "nm"</p> <blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px"> <div class="MessageRFC822Viewer" id="P"> <div class="TextPlainViewer" id="P.P">On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 09:32:08AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:<br> > As it seems hard to debug, what do the java@ maintainers think of this experiment?<br> ><br> > diff --git a/java/openjdk17/Makefile b/java/openjdk17/Makefile<br> > index 5cb25e6aee72..ba7001ff2bd0 100644<br> > --- a/java/openjdk17/Makefile<br> > +++ b/java/openjdk17/Makefile<br> > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ GH_PROJECT= jdk17u<br> ><br> > NO_CCACHE= yes<br> ><br> > -_MAKE_JOBS= #<br> > +MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes<br> > MAKE_ENV= LANG="C" \<br> > LC_ALL="C" \<br> > CLASSPATH="" \<br> <br> That's well spotted! I think this is definitely worth trying. I'm no<br> expert on the ports Makefiles myself, but was told to use<br> MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE instead in the review for openjdk24. Haven't gone<br> through all the ancient version yet, as my focus is mainly on mainline,<br> and these days on openjdk25.<br> <br> > I can commit this today to openjdk17 and if builds start to succeed to other openjdk* ports.<br> <br> I'm in favour!<br> <br> H!</div> <hr></div> </blockquote> <br> </body></html>help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?246244335.3613.1757582776002>
