Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:08:00 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, <standards@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: default gcc conformance mode Message-ID: <20030228160410.M21151-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20030227122421.C93968@espresso.bsdmike.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> writes: > > Should the default conformance mode of gcc be C99+extensions rather > > than C89+extensions? This would make the -pedantic option more useful. > > I think some would argue against it, since we don't have a complete > C99 library yet. Yes. We also don't have a complete C99 compiler. At least the floating point arithmetic on i386's is non-conforming. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030228160410.M21151-100000>