Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:44:04 +1030
From:      Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        Vincent Rioux <vrioux@centrenad.com>
Subject:   Re: Vinum dumpconfig returns nothing ?!?
Message-ID:  <20040214231404.GH61632@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <xzp65e93hor.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References:  <3109.192.168.1.147.1076687025.squirrel@internet.centrenad.com> <xzpsmhfge3m.fsf@dwp.des.no> <3109.192.168.1.147.1076687025.squirrel@internet.centrenad.com> <20040213232611.GP61632@wantadilla.lemis.com> <xzpad3m2e1m.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040214095400.GF61632@wantadilla.lemis.com> <xzp65e93hor.fsf@dwp.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--2nmUZS6EBFTGcnEV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday, 14 February 2004 at 14:37:56 +0100, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> On Saturday, 14 February 2004 at 10:41:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
>>> Last I tried (on 5.1), performance was abysmal
>> How did you measure it?
>
> Bonnie and iostat.

Single process throughput?  Is that how you intend to use the system?
Note that bonnie is a terrible benchmark for storage devices.

>>> and the machine panicked.
>> Where's the dump?
>
> I didn't expect anyone would care.

Well, some people do.  But you can't base claims that "Vinum is
broken" on that kind of evidence.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.

--2nmUZS6EBFTGcnEV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFALqu8IubykFB6QiMRAm0TAJ0ZLJjSa4djNu51M82U4iZTT/6ojQCZAb4v
hlkzDKsLwz4SX0xQ15LRKu0=
=XZim
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2nmUZS6EBFTGcnEV--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040214231404.GH61632>