Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:11:00 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/rc.d Makefile kernel Message-ID: <20060317191059.GK35129@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <200603171628.k2HGSCN8083438@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200603171628.k2HGSCN8083438@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote this message on Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 16:28 +0000:
> des 2006-03-17 16:28:12 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> etc/rc.d Makefile
> Added files:
> etc/rc.d kernel
> Log:
> This script symlinks /boot/kernel to the directory that contains the kernel
> you booted from, unless /boot/kernel already exists and is not a symlink.
> This should only affect people like me who juggle multiple kernels and
> have KODIR = /boot/${KERN_IDENT} in /etc/make.conf to keep them apart.
What part of the tree assumes that /boot/kernel exists? Shouldn't they
be using a dirname'd version of kern.bootfile, which would make this
change unnecessary?
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060317191059.GK35129>