Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:16:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.58.0404211413220.19097@onorysvfu.ybpny> In-Reply-To: <xzp4qrdoxjj.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <6.0.3.0.0.20040420125557.06b10d48@209.112.4.2> <xzp65buh5fa.fsf@dwp.des.no><200404201332.40827.dr@kyx.net> <6.0.3.0.0.20040421121715.04547510@209.112.4.2> <6.0.3.0.0.20040421132605.0901bb40@209.112.4.2> <6.0.3.0.0.20040421161217.05453308@209.112.4.2> <6.0.3.0.0.20040421163904.0738d960@209.112.4.2> <xzp4qrdoxjj.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, [iso-8859-1] Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes: > I think the default ttl of 64 was an arbitrary choice. You would > probably be fine using 32, but any lower than that and you would start > having trouble crossing oceans. ?? Because of all the router buoys floating around?? KeS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSX.4.58.0404211413220.19097>