Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:07:26 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com> To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=" <des@des.no> Cc: Claude Menski <claude.menski@gmail.com>, "freebsd-chat@freebsd.org" <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: I like Ubuntu Message-ID: <d7195cff0704131407i45cf7941ic8147cc53d1b06b4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86mz1ckqlc.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <2a4057fc0704131021t60249c62k4107ee6cf9f1fb8f@mail.gmail.com> <86mz1ckqlc.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13/04/07, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > "Claude Menski" <claude.menski@gmail.com> writes: > > Why is freebsd better then ubuntu? > > I like Ubuntu too. If you want a desktop OS that Just Works and > doesn't require a lot of time to configure and keep up-to-date, it's a > good choice. > > On the server side, however, I find that it is FreeBSD rather than > Linux which Just Works and lets you do excatly what you want without > any fuss. Although I last used gentoo, I would assume that ubuntu has similar features: An older board with an i810 graphics chip works much better for desktop[py|esque|ful|like] use, as linux support for this obsolete piece of trash is fuller and richer. Freebsd tends to work better in every other way, from my admittedly limited experience. --=20 --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d7195cff0704131407i45cf7941ic8147cc53d1b06b4>