Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 01:38:36 -0700 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org>, Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ddb db_ps.c src/sys/i386/i386 genassym.c Message-ID: <200304110138.36151.wes@softweyr.com> In-Reply-To: <20030410164003.G39679@fledge.watson.org> References: <20030410162943.T37530-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> <20030410164003.G39679@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 10 April 2003 13:42, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> :
> :Yes, I'm telling you, if you add anything make it specific to the
> :scheduler. It doesn't not need to be in scheduler independant code.
> : We just need a new system call for binding a kse to a cpu. This will
> : be scheduler independant and then we can call a scheduler dependant
> : routine like sched_bind(kse, cpu);
>
> How could one retrieve the current affinity of a kse? I sorta like the
> linux method of set and get affinity and using a bit mask for the CPUs
> a process can be bound to.
Does this scale well when the number of processors grows large?
I'm just looking forward to FreeBSD on Starfire and Sunfire systems... ;^)
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304110138.36151.wes>