Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 15:38:08 +0200 From: infoomatic <infoomatic@gmx.at> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of virtualization on FreeBSD Message-ID: <3096b38d-e35c-3db7-47b7-9b4765ae2c3a@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <c04fd838-39dc-cd94-8686-7626db6c037f@Gmail.com> References: <c04fd838-39dc-cd94-8686-7626db6c037f@Gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, definitely bhyve. Though it misses some features it is a great hypervisor. Xen has never been more than experimental as Dom0 on FreeBSD, also the freebsd-xen mailing list has been quite idle in recent years. Regards, Robert On 17.05.23 14:00, Steven Friedrich wrote: > I am new to virtualization on FreeBSD and trying to figure out the best > solution for my use case. > > I am running a workstation and hoping to ditch multi-booting several > partitions of FreeBSD, Linux Minst, KDE Neon, etc. > > I only have a single hard drive (6TB), so root-on-zfs is ok, though I am > perplexed by zfs complexity.=C2=A0 I have no intention of offering comme= rcial > virtualization.=C2=A0 I just want to audit OSes. > > I have watched P03A: Xen HVMlite and FreeBSD - Roger Pau Monn=C3=A9 on > YouTube, but I have a hard time viewing and hearing the presentation. Is > there a written version of this presentation with slides available? > > There has been a lot of development of virtualization since this > presentation.=C2=A0 Are there newer presentations of each virtualization > solution? > > Why would I choose bhyve over Xen? > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3096b38d-e35c-3db7-47b7-9b4765ae2c3a>