Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:05:49 +0100 (CET) From: Marcel Stangenberger <marcel@hayholt.org> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: Philip Hallstrom <philip@adhesivemedia.com>, "" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: building a VPN with FreeBSD 4.7p3 Message-ID: <20030205200300.N565@eldar.hayholt.org> In-Reply-To: <3E415935.6030207@potentialtech.com> References: <20030204080406.Q23132-100000@cypress.adhesivemedia.com> <20030204214707.X52428@eldar.hayholt.org> <3E40466E.3000906@potentialtech.com> <20030205125500.A53666@eldar.hayholt.org> <3E414446.3060500@potentialtech.com> <20030205192845.W565@eldar.hayholt.org> <3E415935.6030207@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Well, nat is definately not a requirement for a vtun, it's just that it's > such a common scenerio that it gets lots of howtos written about it. > ok, i'll try to set it up without the usage of NAT > And I would bet that (if you're using RFC-1918 addys as you say) that you > really _are_ using nat. It's just not FreeBSD that's doing it, it's probably > the router in your diagram that has built-in nat capabilities. > you're correct on that. i've just lost my connection to the testmachine on another network so i can't continue the test now, tomorrow will be the soonest Marcel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030205200300.N565>