Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 17:14:25 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r276008 - in head/sys: kern sys Message-ID: <20141221151425.GX2148@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <5496DD08.7060201@FreeBSD.org> References: <201412211332.sBLDW8VC030548@svn.freebsd.org> <5496D86D.7070209@FreeBSD.org> <20141221144154.GW2148@kib.kiev.ua> <5496DD08.7060201@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 04:45:28PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 21/12/2014 16:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Or, are you asking why caching of the name could be needed for > > core dump files at all ? > > Sort of. Why VN_OPEN_NAMECACHE is useful in the case of core dumps? > What does it make better? The vn_fullpath() mostly works for the core files after the change, comparing with the non-working state at all before.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141221151425.GX2148>