Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 05:25:40 +0100 From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: '-ax' option in gcc Message-ID: <3DE054C4.7050408@liwing.de> References: <20021123174502.703cc4cd.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> <3DDFB905.2030107@liwing.de> <20021123192600.0ab4006d.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> <20021123235704.GA73258@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:26:00PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: > >>Yes, thanks for the info, FWIW I think it's quite against POLA to remove >>an option yet keep it documented in the man page :) > > > The man pages are from 2.95 because the 3.x ones require Perl 5.6 + > texinfo to build. So we either (1) totally loose the manpage, or (2) you > can submit a patch in a PR to update the one we do have. > > What about following: 1) remove man pages from base system 2) add a port devel/gcc3man which build depends on texinfo and perl5.6 -- Jens To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DE054C4.7050408>