Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:43:49 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/rarpd Makefile rarpd.8 rarpd.c Message-ID: <20010618114349.F1713@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <74656.992853414@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>; from sheldonh@starjuice.net on Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:36:54AM %2B0200 References: <200106180648.f5I6mXw73601@freefall.freebsd.org> <74656.992853414@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:36:54AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:48:33 MST, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > Reviewed by: dd, silence on -audit > > I'm seeing a lot of these, and they make me nervous. The -audit list > should not preclude -hackers from having a chance to review code. The > -audit list is for security reviews. I usually send serious changes to -arch, too, since many people have pointed out that most of the developers/users have moved away from -hackers. But yes, you are right that this particular change should have gone to some other list, too.. I don't think that lots of people use rarpd(8) anyway :P (NOT a good argument, I know :) G'luck, Peter -- I've heard that this sentence is a rumor. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010618114349.F1713>