Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:51:20 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Thomas M. Skeren III" <tms3@fskklaw.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: SMBFS with AMD64 Message-ID: <20050114025120.GA66894@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <41E704CA.1000405@fskklaw.com> References: <41E6FE9E.5070005@fskklaw.com> <20050113231706.GA19106@xor.obsecurity.org> <41E704CA.1000405@fskklaw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:31:22PM -0800, Thomas M. Skeren III wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:05:02PM -0800, Thomas M. Skeren III wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Trying to compile AMD64 with smbfs.
> >>
> >>Added
> >>
> >>options SMBFS
> >>options NETSMB
> >>
> >>got a lot of errors like this:
> >>
> >>
> >>smb_usr.o(.text+0x5ae): In function `smb_usr_simplerequest':
> >>: undefined reference to `md_get_mem'
> >>smb_usr.o(.text+0x5c3): In function `smb_usr_simplerequest':
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This almost always means that you omitted something mandatory for your
> >kernel configuration. Go back to GENERIC or carefully compare your
> >modified config file to GENERIC and NOTES to look for what you missed.
> >
> >
> Will do, however, I copied GENERIC to NAT and just add the two options,
> and deleted the scsi devices as I don't have SCSI.
>
> Here's the diff:
>
> COr# diff GENERIC NATELF
> 59c59,60
> <
> ---
> > options SMBFS
> > options NETSMB
OK, so follow the advice I gave ("carefully compare your modified
config file to GENERIC and NOTES to look for what you missed").
^^^^^^^^^
Kris
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFB5zOnWry0BWjoQKURAv3EAKCObvq00df724dcBt0LwYWdgPPXhwCg5AZq
aDBgkVIOZInr6XO/oDCzcig=
=a+m/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050114025120.GA66894>