Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 21:59:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: David Xu <bsddiy@yahoo.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_synch.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207052058590.16316-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20020706032222.91526.qmail@web20908.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
the checkin I just made is a stopgap.. I'm thinking about rewriting some of the code there. On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, David Xu wrote: > > with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message > > do we needn't check p->p_sigacts->ps_sigintr? > this change prevents this checking. > I would rather set rval = 0 but not ERESTART, > so ps_sigintr can be checked before return. It's possible that we should also check ps_sigintr in the first cursig() too, but I am not sure it is needed for thread_suspend_check(). The behaviour of threaded processes in the face of signals has not been fully defined yet. > > -David Xu > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free > http://sbc.yahoo.com > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0207052058590.16316-100000>