Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:14:29 +0200 From: "C. P. Ghost" <cpghost@cordula.ws> To: Christian Barthel <bc@nyx.user-mode.org> Cc: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing and using wine on amd64 Message-ID: <CADGWnjXfcYFkbci8SZ1CgwcEXqzOVy3gg-TnkGMpNN2m9htcOw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110815073706.GA17654@nyx.user-mode.org> References: <20110814222708.2a06dc05.freebsd@edvax.de> <20110815073706.GA17654@nyx.user-mode.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Christian Barthel <bc@nyx.user-mode.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:27:08PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: >> Current system is 8.2-STABLE/amd64. Should I better re-install >> everything (Intel Core2 4300 1.80GHz / 1799.81-MHz K8-class CPU >> here, and 2 GB RAM, that's why the AMD64 choice) and use i386 >> instead? > > I don't understand why you have chosen AMD64? You only have 2 GB memory, > which can be adressed under i386 too and you can avoid a lot of > problems. > > Today, I am not quite sure about AMD64 because with PAE ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension#FreeBSD), > you have a far better opportunity to address memory above 4 GB. Some applications run faster in 64-bit mode, because they make good use of the additional free registers... This is particularly important for crypto-stuff (it's noticeable even without benchmarking), and in some multimedia applications as well. And just to wit: some register-hungry applications run even faster on an old UltraSparc IIIi 1500 Mhz despite its slow memory than on a Phenom with 2.4 GHz and fast DDR 3 RAM. So it all depends on the particular applications. -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADGWnjXfcYFkbci8SZ1CgwcEXqzOVy3gg-TnkGMpNN2m9htcOw>