Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:40:08 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd sitting on ldaps port Message-ID: <20041007014008.GA664@empiric.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20041007013001.GH3848@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1097095438.1208.7.camel@server> <20041006205954.GB3848@dan.emsphone.com> <1097102594.1805.4.camel@server> <20041007013001.GH3848@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:30:01PM -0500, Dan Nelson uttered: > > OK, but aren't there rules about rpc allowing assigned ports like that? > > Not as far as I know. I suppose bindresvport() could be changed to > walk /etc/services and only use one of the 450 reserved ports not > listed. I'm more in favour of allowing RPC daemons to be bound to specific ports in order to ease packet filtering. I've done this for mountd(8) for just this reason. BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041007014008.GA664>