Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:40:08 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd sitting on ldaps port Message-ID: <20041007014008.GA664@empiric.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20041007013001.GH3848@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1097095438.1208.7.camel@server> <20041006205954.GB3848@dan.emsphone.com> <1097102594.1805.4.camel@server> <20041007013001.GH3848@dan.emsphone.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:30:01PM -0500, Dan Nelson uttered: > > OK, but aren't there rules about rpc allowing assigned ports like that? > > Not as far as I know. I suppose bindresvport() could be changed to > walk /etc/services and only use one of the 450 reserved ports not > listed. I'm more in favour of allowing RPC daemons to be bound to specific ports in order to ease packet filtering. I've done this for mountd(8) for just this reason. BMShome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041007014008.GA664>