Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 20:19:14 +0200 From: "Peter Salvage" <wizard@sybaweb.co.za> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Routing question - lengthy post Message-ID: <026b01c0defd$e0ddd360$0200a8c0@ait.co.za> References: <015f01c0deeb$855fc1e0$0200a8c0@ait.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Further to my earlier question, I am now assuming (further evidence not presenting itself) that the problem I am experiencing is because I have not defined the necessary static route on the FreeBSD box. I have read the man route pages and request that someone's beady eye be cast over the route statement(s) I want to add, as I am _terrified_ of breaking something :-/ Problem re-defined in abbreviated format: Users are attached to a router on the 192.168.2.228/30 network, said users being allocated the 192.168.2.128/192 network range, are unable to ping/traceroute past the router eth0 interface here. Proposed route statement(s): Route add 192.168.2.228 255.255.255.252 192.168.0.9 Is that enough? Would I also need to add Route add 192.168.2.128 255.255.255.192 192.168.0.9 TIA /wiZZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Salvage" <wizard@sybaweb.co.za> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Sent: 17 May 2001 18:07 Subject: Routing question - lengthy post <snip> > I'm having a routing problem which I hope someone can help me solve: > So, my conclusion is I need to add a route to the FreeBSD box. > > Am I correct? If so, what would be the correct route statement(s) to add? > add route 192.168.2.128/26 192.168.2.218? > add route 192.168.2.228/30 192.168.2.218? </snip> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?026b01c0defd$e0ddd360$0200a8c0>