Date: Tue, 08 Apr 1997 17:18:36 -0700 From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs problem Message-ID: <199704090018.RAA09538@austin.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 1997 09:24:53 %2B0930." <199704082354.JAA21446@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> References: <199704082354.JAA21446@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I find it extremely annoying that named options line "resvport" > aren't documented for mount or mount_nfs. *grumble* "resvport" is documented in mount_nfs(8), under the "-o" option. It and the other named options are described as deprecated, though. > sysctl -w vfs.nfs.nfs_privport=0 Thanks. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704090018.RAA09538>