Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 12:35:49 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> Subject: Re: strace causes panic: sleeping thread Message-ID: <86tzuwrfui.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86y7k8rgc4.fsf@dwp.des.no> (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8r?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?grav's?= message of "Tue, 01 May 2007 12:25:15 %2B0200") References: <200704281128.44077.shoesoft@gmx.net> <20070428115503.GM2441@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86y7k8rgc4.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) writes:
> procfs_ioctl() needs the process to be locked; pn_ioctl() verifies
> that this is the case before calling it. The correct fix is not to
> unlock the process before calling procfs_ioctl(), but to remove the
> latter's redundant PROC_LOCK() / PROC_UNLOCK() calls.
See attached patch.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
[-- Attachment #2 --]
Index: sys/fs/procfs/procfs_ioctl.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_ioctl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 procfs_ioctl.c
--- sys/fs/procfs/procfs_ioctl.c 19 Feb 2007 13:04:25 -0000 1.16
+++ sys/fs/procfs/procfs_ioctl.c 1 May 2007 10:26:17 -0000
@@ -70,7 +70,10 @@
int ival;
#endif
- PROC_LOCK(p);
+ KASSERT(p != NULL,
+ ("%s() called without a process", __func__));
+ PROC_LOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
+
error = 0;
switch (cmd) {
#if defined(COMPAT_FREEBSD5) || defined(COMPAT_FREEBSD4) || defined(COMPAT_43)
@@ -193,7 +196,6 @@
default:
error = (ENOTTY);
}
- PROC_UNLOCK(p);
return (error);
}
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86tzuwrfui.fsf>