Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:27:03 +0100 From: Dario Freni <saturnero@gufi.org> To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Will rfc2734 be supported? Message-ID: <1075559223.615.9.camel@localhost>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-YCx9lmcUif3A/TCv/Vbt Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi guys, I was wondering if the standard implementation of IPoFW is planning to be implemented. I'm not expert on device writing, I was also looking for some workarounds, like attach the fwe0:lower netgraph hook to a virtual interface, but reading the rfc I realized that the normal IP packet needs an encapsulation before it's sent on the wire. Bye, Dario --=20 Dario Freni (saturnero@gufi.org) - SaturNero on IRCNet, Azzurra Gruppo Utenti FreeBSD Italia (http://www.gufi.org) GPG Public key at http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc --=-YCx9lmcUif3A/TCv/Vbt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAG7s3Z1XqWj1OqUERAsyPAKCcHYfzuOWtgARjwpZ4wfplQbz0lACdEOib fb38jNKekHhYE8aVXsIHTWQ= =CWfh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-YCx9lmcUif3A/TCv/Vbt--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1075559223.615.9.camel>