Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 19:36:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi>, Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, dag-erli@ifi.uio.no, net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980513193318.10860B-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <6974.895047065@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What about Dassault's FreeBSD IPv6 inplementation, or NRL's *BSD version (at one stage there was a freebsd version) or Ipsilon's FreeBSD IPv6 stack (just bought by nokia for $120Million) That gives us 5 that I know of, and I think there may be others in the shadows. julian On Wed, 13 May 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I've been using the INRIA stuff for >6 months now and I'm happy with > > that with the exception of the pain I've to go through when I need to > > match -stable patches to the INRIA code which gets up-ported only > > every now and then. > > Great, great, now go run the WIDE stuff and tell us how it compares! :-) > > Seriously, that's the problem here. We don't need advocates who have > tried only ONE implementation comprehensively - we can find plenty of > such folks already and they don't help us at all in making a decision > about which implementation to back. :-( > > - Jordan > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980513193318.10860B-100000>