Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:39:52 +0100
From:      Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
To:        galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OFF TOPIC: pw add user slow
Message-ID:  <e7c4a6d4-7159-a8ae-e7a4-c17f99705a58@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <32125.128.135.52.6.1476801176.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
References:  <fd1e578c-58ef-5098-9d89-c3db814d7af4@ifdnrg.com> <20161018074415.0f6575675db30d0b83d9b8ec@sohara.org> <60719.69.209.239.247.1476794773.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <20161018140531.GA1080@lime.woodcruft.co.uk> <3ceed8a7-50dd-2fd5-d110-4a77e43f36ad@freebsd.org> <32125.128.135.52.6.1476801176.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--Ut3TeORXW3ix6E9WuRdFAMkU9KgJs1x9Q
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nRnnR482pO3IXw76LcdgjFdVTK42jTdJj";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>
To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <e7c4a6d4-7159-a8ae-e7a4-c17f99705a58@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: pw add user slow
References: <fd1e578c-58ef-5098-9d89-c3db814d7af4@ifdnrg.com>
 <20161018074415.0f6575675db30d0b83d9b8ec@sohara.org>
 <60719.69.209.239.247.1476794773.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
 <20161018140531.GA1080@lime.woodcruft.co.uk>
 <3ceed8a7-50dd-2fd5-d110-4a77e43f36ad@freebsd.org>
 <32125.128.135.52.6.1476801176.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To: <32125.128.135.52.6.1476801176.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>

--nRnnR482pO3IXw76LcdgjFdVTK42jTdJj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 10/18/16 15:32, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> I have off topic question. Just the other day I got warning that doveco=
t
> port currently has no maintainer. I was so happy with dovecot for over =
one
> and a half decades, so switching to something else doesn't give me good=

> feelings. Anybody knows any more details about dovecot port?

Yes.  Why aren't you using the mail/dovecot2 port?  Especially if this
is a new install.

IIRC.  mail/dovecot was kept around because of some incompatible changes
when mail/dovecot2 was released.  That was many years ago now, and I'm
not sure if keeping the old dovecot port really is still necessary.
Everyone should have had ample time to migrate to dovecot2.

	Cheers,

	Matthew



--nRnnR482pO3IXw76LcdgjFdVTK42jTdJj--

--Ut3TeORXW3ix6E9WuRdFAMkU9KgJs1x9Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=cKLH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Ut3TeORXW3ix6E9WuRdFAMkU9KgJs1x9Q--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e7c4a6d4-7159-a8ae-e7a4-c17f99705a58>