Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:40:12 +0200 From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> To: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: On the use of Tun interfaces. Message-ID: <C61DFAA2-A478-4F4A-BAC7-87DBBBEF2AC9@lassitu.de> In-Reply-To: <17596.26134.831813.158138@canoe.dclg.ca> References: <17596.26134.831813.158138@canoe.dclg.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 18.07.2006 um 06:39 schrieb David Gilbert: > [3:15:315]dgilbert@canoe:~/devel/failsafe> netstat -rn ... > 192.168.22.1 192.168.12.2 UH 0 0 tun0 > > shouldn't the last route there be active? Any clues here? The last time I tried to get a tun interface set up (admittedly, back in 2.2 days), I had similiar problems with weird routing entries. IIRC, when configuring the tun interface, I failed to initialize all sockaddr's properly. The interface looked right, but the routes were botched. memset took care of it then. HTH, Stefan -- Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Fon +49 170 346 0140
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C61DFAA2-A478-4F4A-BAC7-87DBBBEF2AC9>