Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:28:56 -0400 From: Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: non-responding processes after truss(1)ing Message-ID: <CAMXt9NaXNK_3nc91cBVMpW4CJbcLb_qpEk3-i0C4v_G2WyRGoQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E81A31B.6080300@gmx.com> References: <4E819DF7.3060306@gmx.com> <20110927101008.GA27810@icarus.home.lan> <4E81A31B.6080300@gmx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@gmx.com> wrote: > On 9/27/2011 1:10 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> >> kill -9 your truss processes; the underlying processes which you are >> truss'ing will probably resume. >> >> My experience for years has been that truss on FreeBSD is extremely >> buggy and cannot be relied upon (case in point). =C2=A0Such is still the= case >> on RELENG_8 as of today. >> >> Use ktrace(1) instead. =C2=A0You'll find it to work pretty much in every >> situation. >> What about using dtruss in place of truss is the dtrace implementation of truss any better then the old libkvm ? > > Thanks, that worked. I'll use ktrace from now on. > > Nikos > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 mark saad | nonesuch@longcount.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMXt9NaXNK_3nc91cBVMpW4CJbcLb_qpEk3-i0C4v_G2WyRGoQ>