Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:09:32 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Hilko Meyer <Hilko.Meyer@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Handbook-appearance in Opera Message-ID: <20040810000932.GA23836@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <4q0gh05ot2512gvv7hjjm6q6so4bbof3er@smtp.compuserve.de> References: <4q0gh05ot2512gvv7hjjm6q6so4bbof3er@smtp.compuserve.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-08-10 01:43, Hilko Meyer <Hilko.Meyer@gmx.de> wrote: > I've spotted some some problems in > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-nis.html > [...] > And there is another nit. Around "NIS domainname" some tags are missing. > The other entries are shown bold. If I understand the sgml-code correct, > the following should fix that. The rest of the entries are shown in bold because they are "application names". The string "NIS domainname" is not an application name so it shouldn't be marked up as one. > --- chapter.sgml Mon Aug 9 20:21:21 2004 > +++ chapter-mod.sgml Mon Aug 9 20:27:00 2004 > @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ > </thead> > <tbody> > <row> > - <entry>NIS domainname</entry> > + <entry><application>NIS domainname</application></entry> > > <entry>An NIS master server and all of its clients > (including its slave servers) have a NIS domainname. No, please. The semantics of the <application> element should be not abused just to get a "look and feel that we like". If the rest of the application names look odd because of their bold font we should probably consider removing the application tags from the rest instead. A lot of bold words sprinkled in a seemingly random manner among running text look worse than something that abuses the <application> element IMHO. This is, of course, my own personal opinion and should be taken with a grain of salt ;-) - Giorgos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040810000932.GA23836>