Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:12:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Oliver Fromme <olli@secnetix.de> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Annother Wireless network card annother problem Message-ID: <200304151012.h3FAC3Qf049467@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200304150047.KAA13064@lightning.itga.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au> wrote: > I use a Dlink DWL-520 PCI card with the wi driver and this works just fine. I > currently use it as a base station (HOSTAP mode) but it also works as a client > (using an Apple base station) or in Ad-Hoc mode. I've also used the DLink > DWL-650 PCMCIA card in a laptop which also works fine. These two cards use > the "Prism2.5" chipset and any other Prism2.5-based cards should work as well. Unfortunately, that's not the case. A friend of mine bought an SMC 2632 recently. It is even listed in the wi(4) manpage, but doesn't work with FreeBSD (works fine with Windows, so the card isn't broken). It's recognized, but doesn't work. When I inserted a WaveLan card of mine into his notebook for testing purposes, it worked fine, too, so his hardware and PCMCIA setup are alright. My guess is that SMC changed some details in the hardware of their cards without changing the name of the product (why should they -- it ships with a driver for Windows, so everyone should be happy ... not). > NB: the (very similar-sounding) DWL-520+ and DWL-650+ (22Mbps) parts are _not_ > the same. They are not Prism2.5 based, and I have no idea if they work in > FreeBSD at all. All 22Mbps cards are based on a TI chipset, for which there is no documentation available (apparently not even under NDA), so consequently FreeBSD doesn't support it. Regards Oliver PS: Yeah, hardware sucks. And hardware vendors suck. -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304151012.h3FAC3Qf049467>